Weaving Geoffrey Chaucer into the plot as an eyewitness to the events was a clever notion. Oh, I'm sorry, you're not familiar with Mr. Chaucer? "Canterbury Tales?" As in, Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales?" We're supposed to recognize that the Geoffrey Chaucer as an eyewitness in this movie draws from these adventures as the inspiration for his masterpiece. We're even gratuitously introduced to a Summoner and a Pardoner, whom Chaucer vows to make immortal (ah, the dramatic irony).
The dialogue is chivalrously poetic - even moving at times. It certainly seems appropriate for medieval Europe. However, I must take exception to the introduction of 20th Century music to the 14th Century, irregardless of how fitting the lyrics are to the story. It just doesn't fit. Although there are light moments, it's a fairly serious tale about romantic love, love of friends, love of family, and the conflict of good vs. evil. Using out-of-period music is just a transparent attempt to increase sales of the soundtrack by broadening its appeal.
Usually, I detest product placement in movies. As long as the placement is fleeting, I've learned to stomach it. I must admit, however, that I chuckled when the Nike "Swoosh" was revealed. |
